Home » All My Posts » Tradition of Literature

Tradition of Literature

If statisticians among you forgive this dotty averment, I would suggest that 80% of the pre-modern Islamic legal corpus is probably an exploration, preservation and explanation of the remaining 20% textual source. The hypothesis does not mean to undervalue the creativity or question the originality of classical legal texts but merely purports that what is chiefly believed to be a tradition of Islamic law may alternatively be understood as a tradition of literature, transmitting Islamic legal philosophy as a distinguishable part of the conversation.

The notion has more dynamism because contrary to an allegedly stagnant tradition of pre-modern law, a rich tradition of literature contains in itself the possibilities to explore various traditions of thoughts, actions and historical aspirations for social control. Most importantly, this kind of slant makes the writings of pre-modern Muslim jurists more accessible by making a contemporary reader intellectually accomodative towards seemingly extravagant explorations, complex variations, apparant absurdities and endless citations of authorities. That however, is a different point which I am not prepared to expand upon in the present entry.

My present contention is simple: covering breadth of traditional Islamic law may not seem an unsurmountable undertaking if one remains riveted to dig out legal value from a vast tradition of literature. This legal value is to be looked initially into a comparatively smaller portion of the corpus.

A quick examplary look at some of the classical Hanafi works would elucidate the point I am trying to bring across.
fiqhThe proverbial 20% includes 4 to 6 juridic works of Muhammad bin Hasan al-Shaibani, the famous student of Abu Hanifa who recorded
his teacher’s opinions, decisions and writings which are now extinct. These books are 1) Jama’a Kabeer 2) Jama’a Sagheer 3) Kitab al-Asl or Mabsut 4) Ziyaad’at 5) Sayr Kabeer and 6) Sayr Sagheer. The condensed version of all six works was first prepared by another Hanafi jurist Hakim Marwazi who titled it as al-Kafi fi Furu’u al-Hanafia’a. The complete three volumes of al-Kafi were expanded into a 30 volume commentary by Shams al-Din Sarakhasi. Burhanuddin Murghainaani carried out a comparative study of Quduri’s Mukhtasar (a precise text of Hanafi fiqh produced long after Shaibani’s works) and Shaibani’s Jama’a Sagheer producing another work by the name of Hidayaat al-Mubtadi. Murghainani than wrote a 60 volume exegesis of his own work which was titled as Kifayaat al-Muntahi. The famous Hidayaa which is still taught as a Hanafi text in most of the religious shools is a condensed readable version of this Kifaayah; also prepared by the same author for students. More than 100 years later, an exegesis of Hidayaah was carried out by Mhammad ibn Sadr generally famous as Waqayaah; condensed explanation of which is still included in the current curriculum.

It seems a tad too complex to discover and disentangle different layers of these texts as these are extended on overlapping periods of history. Just a cursory analysis of any school’s (Hanafi, for instance) textual history would reveal that we are dealing with piles of texts with innumerable commentaries, interpretations and elucidations. The more famous ones by Nasafi, Kassani, Mosali, Ibn Najm and Ibn Abideen can be analysed with some effort, but just to investigate the chains of origins.

The complexity, like the genre itself, is multidimensional and its theological character has to be explored in search of meaningfullness. A modern reader can easily loose interest and question the priorities of traditional writers. Syed Qutb’s remark is perhaps a good showcase for this kind of growing unease:

The Shariah has been revealed in order to be implemented, not to be known, studied and changed into culture in books and treatises.

In my view, the genre available to us as Fiqh may principally be experienced as a literary discourse rather than a legal one. A contemporary mind dwelling into it should understand that classical jurists might not have a sensible and workable corpus of law in their minds all the times. The aim varies according to a particular jurist’s inclination, keeping in view the end he wanted to achieve. The purpose is sometimes to produce a concise text for swift committal to memory, a commentary to explicate a condensed text or a super-commentary to elaborate an exisiting commentary. Rather than getting repulsed by the exhorbitant quantity of seemingly outdated written word, it is more objective and feasible for students of knowledge to classify the texts according to their degree of originality and concentrate first on the most original ones for exploration of traditional Islamic law.




9 thoughts on “Tradition of Literature

  1. In The Name Of Allah, The Most Gracious, The Most Merciful

    As salaam ‘alaykum warahmatullah wabarakatuh

    Non-Profit Making African Muslim Website For Knowledge About Islam And Propagation Of Islam In Association With AWQAF Africa http://www.awqafafrica.com

    As salaam ‘alaykum,

    Brother Abu Muhammad

    Under the sure shade of Allah’s Speech:

    “Say: “Are those who know equal to those who know not?” It is only men of understanding who will remember (i.e. get a lesson from Allâh’s Signs and Verses” [Surat uz Zumar:9]


    “Thus We have made you [true Muslims] a just (and the best) nation, that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger (Muhammad PBUH) be a witness over you” [Surat ul Baqarah: 143]

    We at http://www.esinislam.com are pleased to know about you.

    This, therefore, is to invite you to become of our volunteer regular articles contributors who post their writings on Islam, Muslim Affairs, and Literatures regularly to our website http://www.esinislam.com

    “Successful indeed are the believers: Who are humble in their prayers. And who shun vain conversation. And who are payers of the poor-due. And who guard their modesty…” Q23:1-6.

    The Prophet (s.a.w.) said: “The world is cursed, and cursed is all what is in it except with worship and remembrance of Allah (s.w.t.), and except he who upholds to the worship of Allah (s.w.t.) and His remembrance or he who teaches about Allah (s.w.t.) or he who learns about Allah (s.w.t.).” [Reported at Tirmidhiy & Ibn Majah (declared Hasan by at Tirmidhiy)].

    Your contributions are gratefully welcomed. We love Muslims like you for Allah’s sake. May Allah reward you for all your efforts to fight for Islam through your wise and informative pens.

    To have your article posted and published on our website is easy. Simply forward your articles to us at articles@esinislam.com

    Thus, I suggest you feel free to contact me if you may want to engage me in a further brotherly contact regarding your writings etc. contributions.

    We look forward to your availing the entire Ummah via our website as well as your articles posted to us.

    May I congratulate you for Al Basirah endowed upon you! May Almighty Allah continue to guide you and ourselves.

    Ma’ as salaam

  2. Pingback: Abdur Rahman’s Corner

  3. AS

    Abu Muhammad


    You raise the very issues that are necessary to move forward or at least that is what I have gathered from the trend in contemporary scholarship whether “traditional” as realized in the Arab world particularly Egypt which is more dynamic then many traditional circles or ijtihad oriented.

    We must first realize how the literature works and the intents behind its compostition. You know as I sat with my Shaikh Taha Jabir Al-Awani {h} a couple weeks back he mentioned that there is a genre in Islamic literature that was compiled for preservation of Islamic literature in the face of the Tartar attacks and the fall of Iraq.

    On another occassion we learned that the commentary system was meant to simplify what came before and also preserve the Arabic language.

    We could talk about this stuff for quite sometime it is by no means a light subject.

    The key I believe is that the literature is not sacred but mounted onto the sacred and it can be reinterpreted and preserved and also explored an reactivated and also in some cases abandoned. There is a vast difference between it and revelation.

    I harbor a hope that at minimum we gather the literacy to understand how to approach the tradition and can unlock the logic of the authors of the literature. Unfortunately, we have not come to understand that it is a scholarly corpus of ideas and experience that we inherited. Rather, some of us have bequethed tradition with the status of revelation and some of us have come to devalue it.
    The more articles we have that can build a discourse that will help us understand how to deal with tradition and know what its aims are and understand how it emerged and developed than I think we will not approach it in a spirit of imbalance. I think this article does just that it helps us to learn to understand tradition.

    I look forward to more such writings.

    Ahl Al-Hadith.Wordpress


  4. Pingback: Islamic Law & Social Change « Non Skeptical Essays

  5. Pingback: Dynamics of Change in Islamic Law (II): Iftaa, Ijtihad and Social Customs « Non Skeptical Essays

  6. Pingback: Dynamics of Change in Islamic Law (II): Iftaa, Ijtihad and Social Customs « Pak Tea House

  7. Pingback: Is Islam a patriarchical tradition (I): Understanding the hermeneutical gap | Hanging Odes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s